The news is out- Verizon is listed as the top carrier by Consumer Reports. I am sure that we will see a number of press releases from various carriers who were not number one claiming that the testing was flawed or exhorting virtues that Consumer Reports did not mention. (Like Sprint’s Used To Be the Largest All Digital Network)
Consumer Reports did not like the mergers of Cingular/AT&T or Nextel/Sprint as they decrease competition and up the potential for confusion when customers are forced to switch new plans.
What is suprising is that T-Mobile is ranked second across the nation. My personal experience with T-Mobile has been that outside of major cities it’s coverage was poor.
What is not suprising is that in light of those factors reviewed: area service coverage, dropped calls, static and busy circuits, that the carriers were only rated mediocre. As I have not read the whole Consumer Reports article, I don’t know if they mention any of the reasons why these failures occur. Anyone who has performed site acquisition or led a zoning hearing knows that the preferred technical location for a tower is often not the actual location where it ends up. And the everpresent NIMBY’s who certainly answered the survey in a negative fashion that Consumer Reports used to create its findings are the same people that bemoan any tower.
Case Study: T-Mobile Wants to Triple Your Rooftop Cell Site — Should You Let Them?…
Short answer: almost never. Longer answer below, because if you're a landowner trying to figure…
Good and Bad for 2025Rather than the usual brag-fest, here's what actually happened in 2025—the…
The current situation on Martha’s Vineyard is a textbook example of what happens when an…
In October 2025, Steel in the Air obtained a letter sent by DISH Wireless LLC…
Over the last decade, we’ve heard plenty of talk about how cell tower sites would…