In a series of new press releases from Cingular regarding cell tower development in the SouthEast, there is a common statment included. “Cingular is not only planning to build additional sites across (pick state) to further enhance the local networks, but also to “cherry pick” sites from the existing AT&T Wireless network that will quickly add coverage to areas of need.”
Does this mean that Cingular will choose the AT&T sites which complement its network best while continuing to operate a less efficient AT&T network? How does this impact AT&T’s legacy TDMA customers?
Statements by AT&T reps to clients of mine that they were renegotiating with indicated that Cingular would be reviewing all sites (including Cingular’s) and then prioritizing them based on lease rate and term remaining. It is assumed that they will prioritize those sites that provide the best coverage. But the statement issued by Cingular seems to indicate that there will not be any turnoff of Cingular sites- which does not jive with popular opinion or previous statements.
Are Investors Getting Spooked by Build-to-Relocate Tower Strategies? Last month, two major private cell tower…
What a Team Icebreaker Revealed About Who We Really Are At our April 27th virtual…
Case Study: T-Mobile Wants to Triple Your Rooftop Cell Site — Should You Let Them?…
Short answer: almost never. Longer answer below, because if you're a landowner trying to figure…
Good and Bad for 2025Rather than the usual brag-fest, here's what actually happened in 2025—the…
The current situation on Martha’s Vineyard is a textbook example of what happens when an…