We compiled a comparison of the three most recent wireless carrier tower company deals.   It is important to note that these numbers aren’t exact. For example, the Tower Cash Flow for Verizon/American Tower are projections from the first year of operation. On the AT&T/Crown transaction, the number of towers is rounded off.   Lastly, some like the Verizon/AMT transaction don’t include the net present value of the options to acquire these towers in the future.

Of specific note, it is interesting to see that the Verizon portfolio has the fewest number of tenants per tower yet has similar cash flow per tower as AT&T and almost 50% greater cash flow per tower than T-Mobile. Also interesting is that the deal multiples for all three transactions are fairly similar. (Some analysts are suggesting that the actual multiple of cash flow for the Verizon portfolio is closer to 23 or 24 times.)

All in all, it appears that Verizon pulled a significant amount of value out of this portfolio given its lower tenancy per tower, lower annual escalation of 2%, and protection from future rent increases in the near term for additional tower modifications.

Ken Schmidt

Recent Posts

Wall Street Is Discounting Build-to-Relocate Towers. Landowners Should Pay Attention.

Are Investors Getting Spooked by Build-to-Relocate Tower Strategies? Last month, two major private cell tower…

1 week ago

SITA: Behind the Cards

What a Team Icebreaker Revealed About Who We Really Are At our April 27th virtual…

2 weeks ago

SITA’s Good and Bad for 2025

Good and Bad for 2025Rather than the usual brag-fest, here's what actually happened in 2025—the…

3 months ago