We compiled a comparison of the three most recent wireless carrier tower company deals. It is important to note that these numbers aren’t exact. For example, the Tower Cash Flow for Verizon/American Tower are projections from the first year of operation. On the AT&T/Crown transaction, the number of towers is rounded off. Lastly, some like the Verizon/AMT transaction don’t include the net present value of the options to acquire these towers in the future.
Of specific note, it is interesting to see that the Verizon portfolio has the fewest number of tenants per tower yet has similar cash flow per tower as AT&T and almost 50% greater cash flow per tower than T-Mobile. Also interesting is that the deal multiples for all three transactions are fairly similar. (Some analysts are suggesting that the actual multiple of cash flow for the Verizon portfolio is closer to 23 or 24 times.)
All in all, it appears that Verizon pulled a significant amount of value out of this portfolio given its lower tenancy per tower, lower annual escalation of 2%, and protection from future rent increases in the near term for additional tower modifications.
Case Study: T-Mobile Wants to Triple Your Rooftop Cell Site — Should You Let Them?…
Short answer: almost never. Longer answer below, because if you're a landowner trying to figure…
Good and Bad for 2025Rather than the usual brag-fest, here's what actually happened in 2025—the…
The current situation on Martha’s Vineyard is a textbook example of what happens when an…
In October 2025, Steel in the Air obtained a letter sent by DISH Wireless LLC…
Over the last decade, we’ve heard plenty of talk about how cell tower sites would…