Categories: Uncategorized

Advice to Cities on Small Cell Agreements

Steel in the Air recently completed a workshop for a major metropolitan city regarding its small call policy. The City had been contacted by one Big Four wireless carriers, and multiple third party management companies, all of whom wanted a share of the City’s revenue in exchange for “managing” its small cell builds. In reviewing the proposal that the WSP made to the City, it was clear that all parties, including the City, were treating the proposal just as they would a traditional macrocell/ tower proposal.  It wasn’t until we sat down with the City, that we collectively began to understand that the real opportunity reached far beyond the revenue component.  .  Read Story

 

Ken Schmidt

Recent Posts

Examining the Objectivity of Surveys/Polls for Private Networking

In recent years, there has been a proliferation of studies commissioned by system integrators and…

2 months ago

Which US Tower Companies Were Most Active in Jan. 2024?

  We examined applications for environmental notice to the FCC for the last month.  Here…

3 months ago

Will Satellites Replace Cell Towers? Unpacking Black Dot’s Claims.

Recently, Black Dot (a cell tower lease optimization company) has been contacting landowners with a…

3 months ago

PREPAID CELL TOWER LEASES AND EASEMENTS – WHAT TO WATCH OUT FOR

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in offers to landowners to "pre-pay"…

5 months ago

Number of Cell Towers and Small Cells in the United States in 2023

The Wireless Infrastructure Association recently issued a white paper that included their estimates of the…

1 year ago

The Early Days of the Cell Tower Lease Buyout Business

During my early days in the wireless industry, while employed by a tower company, I…

1 year ago