YouTube spokesperson said today that T-Mobile’s new BingeOn video streaming service, which it offers to subscribers for free, is interfering with and reducing the quality of YouTube video traffic.

According to The Internet Association, an Internet advocacy group, “T-Mobile’s new ‘streaming optimization’ program appears to involve throttling of all video traffic, across all data plans, regardless of network congestion.” T-Mobile justifies its new offering by stating that BingeOn uses 1/3 the amount of data, and thus is overall beneficial to congested networks.

However it only takes some basic math to determine that if and when T-Mobile increases its BingeOn subscriber base, the amount of data used will be more than comparable to other content providers who are still supplying high-definition videos. In any case, the FCC has been asked to conduct a review to determine whether or not BingeOn is in violation of net neutrality rules, which are meant to enforce equal access to content across all content providers.

The Internet Association supports the FCC’s request to T-Mobile for “additional insight” in to the process BingeOn uses, and declares that “Reducing data charges for entire classes of applications can be legitimate and benefit consumers, so long as clear notice and choice is provided to service providers and consumers. However, a reasonably designed zero-rating program does not include the throttling of traffic for services or consumers that do not participate.”

In other words, technological innovations, especially those that save consumer’s money while at the same time optimizing network efficiency, are more than welcome within the wireless industry, but not if they affect other content providers’ service offerings, against their will.

At the heart of the matter is another question worth pondering here: Is it fair for T-Mobile to “force” other content providers to trim down their video bandwidth to match T-Mobile’s 480p, thereby providing the same low-resolution/ low-quality videos to their customers, or else

What do you think?

Ken Schmidt

Recent Posts

Between a DAS and a Hard Place: Chilmark’s Difficult Legal Reality

The current situation on Martha’s Vineyard is a textbook example of what happens when an…

1 month ago

DISH Wireless Lease Excuse Letter

In October 2025, Steel in the Air obtained a letter sent by DISH Wireless LLC…

3 months ago

Edge Data Centers at Tower Sites: The High Bar and the Real Opportunity

Over the last decade, we’ve heard plenty of talk about how cell tower sites would…

5 months ago

Dish Network’s Wireless Exit Strategy and Its Impact on Lease Valuation

For the past several years, Dish Network’s entry into the wireless carrier business has been…

6 months ago

Why Lease Buyout Companies Buy Cell Tower Leases

By Ken Schmidt | Steel in the Air One of the most frequent questions we…

9 months ago

Is Verizon Selling Towers?

Recent news reports have confirmed that Verizon has engaged a third-party advisor to evaluate the…

2 years ago