A client of mine forwarded to me some documentation that was provided by Cingular and AWS regarding “average ground rent” rates for cell tower leases for a state in the NW. The documentation consisted of a “appraisal” and I use that word loosely and a spreadsheet of 6 different cell tower locations with their ground rents shown.
The information is provided as a means of “encouraging” the landowner to accept the offered tower lease rate that was provided to him that was lower than the average. Yet there is no documentation of the sample of leases that this information was taken from and no indication that it was representative of anything other than that it showed the rents for the towers chosen by the “appraiser” or by AWS as representative.
So why show a landowner that the rate you offered him is lower than the average for the area? Your guess is as good as mine. If you are interested in seeing the report, please feel free to email me for more information.
Are Investors Getting Spooked by Build-to-Relocate Tower Strategies? Last month, two major private cell tower…
What a Team Icebreaker Revealed About Who We Really Are At our April 27th virtual…
Case Study: T-Mobile Wants to Triple Your Rooftop Cell Site — Should You Let Them?…
Short answer: almost never. Longer answer below, because if you're a landowner trying to figure…
Good and Bad for 2025Rather than the usual brag-fest, here's what actually happened in 2025—the…
The current situation on Martha’s Vineyard is a textbook example of what happens when an…