I appreciate the attempt to outline the information, but I am concerned that the possible risks have been minimized. We should not be building infrastructure without being sure that we are doing so in a safe manner. The industry should NOT be controlling or guiding public infrastructure decision making. Credible scientific studies have been done, all over the world that suggest that there is a connection between the use of these technologies and certain types of cancers and disorders in people. I am especially concerned for students.

http://www.bioinitiative.org/how-wireless-technologies-may-affect-childhood-development/

http://www.bioinitiative.org/whats-new-2/

If these technologies are safe, then why did the California Medical Association ask Los Angeles Unified School District not to install a wireless system in their schools? Of course, LAUSD wanting to move ahead with new technology, went ahead and installed two systems in some schools and had both systems on for a while without informing either parents or staff of the possible dangers to the health of the people in these facilities. There is research, there is concern, but the companies who are profiting are pushing municipalities to spend infrastructure money without understanding the risk to students and staff from these technologies.            

.https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Medical_Expert_Statements_Recommendations_on_EMF.pdf

https://ehtrust.org/the-california-medical-association-wireless-resolution/

The routers in the classrooms are not "far away" from the user, and they pose a danger that is constant, because although the system is not always in use, it is constantly turned on and sending out signals. the many routers close to each other from other classrooms in a school also set up interactive wave patterns that also impact living organisms in the building. Read some of the studies available. I am disappointed in SITA for not making use of current information available to them to give the public a more complete understanding of this technology. According to doctors and scientists who are working in this field, there are concerns. If the laws continue to discount health concerns as a basis for not building towers than the laws protect profit over health and they are bad laws.

First off, I am sorry to hear about your dog’s passing on. My condolences.

As to your question, I will suggest that I don’t personally believe there is any correlation. However, I will suggest that there are studies that other people believe suggest there is a correlation. Even if there is some causal relationship, I strongly doubt that just visiting a park even daily with a cell tower even daily for a few hours would be enough. Hope this helps.